Results 1 to 5 of 5
03-19-2013, 11:24 AM #1
Normal for 2001 Suburban to go through brake pads without wearing down rotors?
I just completed the brake job this past weekend.
Is it normal for these models just to wear out pads without chewing up rotors? I was a little surprised as I was planning also on replacing front and rear rotors but the rotors were not even worn down. They did not even need resurfacing. There was minimal wear on the rotor surfaces but the pads were almost down to 3/16" at 170k miles. The old factory pads leave a lot of brake dust on the wheels though.
I was just happy not to spend extra on front and rear rotors.2011 Chevy Silverado LT 4WD 17k miles
2001 Suburban 2WD, 5.3, V8 167k miles
03-19-2013, 12:20 PM #2
simply put yes. One thing chevy got right was how the stock pads wore.David
2004 Silverado 2500 Crew Cab 4x4, AMSOIL EA air filter, Granatelli MAF sensor, Throttle body spacer, Magnaflow exhaust (true dual to 2 in 1 out muffler), 6" ProComp lift (add a leaf and 5" superlift rear block), Bilstein shocks, 35's (Cooper Disoverer ST) and 4.10 gears, Rhino Liner, fiberglass tonneau cover, EGRUSA fender Flares and widow visors, extended stainless steel brake lines, firestone airbags w/onboard air compressor, Tuff Country trac bars, Pioneer Avic X940BT navigation, Accel backup camera.
1960 Land Rover Series II 88
2002 Nissan Altima (My Commuter)
2013 Toyota Avalon Limited (Wife's Car)
NRA Life Member
03-19-2013, 12:39 PM #3
03-19-2013, 04:51 PM #4
170K, do you think the factory pads lasted that long?
Have you had the truck from day 1?Ray
'09 Avalanche LTZ - Black
'05 Envoy XL (sold)
03-19-2013, 07:07 PM #5
I've had the truck since 8k miles. The wife drives it. She is not very hard on the brakes always anticipating stops.
Replies: 0Last Post: 06-27-2010, 03:50 PM
Replies: 0Last Post: 06-25-2010, 10:50 PM
Replies: 0Last Post: 06-21-2010, 11:00 PM
Replies: 0Last Post: 05-28-2010, 03:40 PM
Replies: 0Last Post: 02-25-2010, 07:20 PM
Tags for this Thread