Results 31 to 36 of 36
04-05-2013, 03:10 PM #31
summitwhite11 thanked for this post04-29-2013, 06:15 PM #32
Do yourself (and your truck) a favor by checking out The Range Technology V8 AFM Eliminator module. Plain and simple, it works.The Cheap-*ss Modder & Thread Killer
The Realist says, "The glass is too big".
2007 Chevy Tahoe LS
Red Sport Metallic w/ Tan Leather Interior
5.3 L FLEX w/AFM, 4A, Stock.
2013 GMC Sierra 1500 SLT Z60 4WD Crew Cab
Mineral Green Metallic w/ Tan Leather Interior
5.3 L FLEX w/AFM, 6A, Cheap-*ss Mods
32 Dump Club Member
Range V8 AFM Eliminator
04-29-2013, 08:07 PM #33
I am using a SCT GM preferred and it works well to turning off the AFM, DOD and many other options! http://www.sctflash.com/2010 GMC SIERRA CREW CAB (Silver) 4x4, ReadyLift 2.5" Level Kit, 305/60/18 Dick Cepek Mud Country, Go Rhino Nerf Bars, Husky Liners front and rear, Bushwacker Bed Rail Caps, SCT Programmer.
01-18-2014, 09:22 AM #34
- Join Date
- Jan 2014
I have a 2014 5.3 Sierra. Putting shift lever into M5 mode DOES prevent the cylinder deactivation mode. Keeping it in M5 mode keeps the truck in V8 mode 100% of the time; which I prefer when driving below 60 mph.
When I get on hwy, I push the + button to go to M6. It will then allow the cylinder deactivation to act normally. When I get off the hwy, I push the - button to go back to M5. It then operates in V8 mode, and still operates as an automatic transmission in 1-5 gears.
My question is... Does cylinder deactivation hurt the engine? I'm reading a lot of posts about oil burning. I'm considering the AFM Range in order to disable the V4 mode completely. Any thoughts?
01-18-2014, 09:44 AM #35
I put the Range on my 2013 the day after it came home, new, from the dealer back in early June. I had seen tons of issues that folks had posted regarding AFM problems. Many TSB's out from GM on how to address engine issues, that seem to be directly attributable to AFM.
But the AFM thing went against everything I hate. Guess it is my upbringing, 7 years in the military, and other experiences, that make be uneasy about some cylinders working while others are out on a smoke break. I realize that the government has had a big influence on GM in the last few years, but I am not going to have my engine acting like government workers, where 4 stand around goofing off while the other 4 work. I dissolved that "union contract" in my engine and demand that when I turn on the key, all cylinders are required to "pack the gear" and work as a team. I paid for 8 cylinders, and I expect them all to work. That is how engines are designed.
I am reminded of a Star Trek movie, where they stole the original Enterprise and the new Excellsior star ship was going to give chase but conked out. Scotty is heard commenting "aye, the more complicated the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain". This whole AFM thing brings a level of complexity to the engines that is unnecessary and shows no appreciable return for the design cost. It was done merely to placate some government dweebs. Many who have shut it off have reversed oil consumption issues and have not experienced any mpg hit for doing so. And of all the posts I have read about shutting it off, I have never read of a single occurrence where someone regretted it.
How you go about it... tune or Range... just do it! You will not regret it.2013 Silverado 1500 LT Z-71 Crew. 5.3L Auto. Range AFM Delete, PCV Catch Can, RC Leveling kit, Dynomax Ultra Flo cat back, Airaid M.I.T.
2013 Freightliner Columbia. pre-EGR Detroit 12.7L 500 hp 1850 lb torque, 18 speed.
summitwhite11 liked this post01-18-2014, 04:37 PM #36
By reggiecab2000 in forum Programmers & TuningReplies: 7Last Post: 03-30-2012, 07:17 PM
By KyleZ71 in forum Chevy Truck AccessoriesReplies: 4Last Post: 11-07-2010, 11:19 AM
By 08bowtie in forum Performance & FuelReplies: 1Last Post: 03-02-2010, 10:12 PM
By nickpatton_189 in forum Performance & FuelReplies: 1Last Post: 09-24-2009, 04:04 PM
By gsvar2004 in forum Performance & FuelReplies: 4Last Post: 06-02-2008, 07:54 PM
Tags for this Thread