GM Truck Club
THE PREMIER CHEVY TRUCK & SUV FORUM
Founded in 2004 ~ We're the #1 Chevy Truck & SUV Forum.
Silverado & Sierra | Tahoe & Yukon | Suburban & Yukon XL | SUV & CROSSOVER
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Default looking for any information on a 1970's silverado

    A friend of mine picked up this truck, I believe it is a 72 model silverado., it says it has a 307? that is unusual for a GM truck?

















    - - - Updated - - -
    Last edited by PantheraUncia; 07-16-2013 at 06:42 PM.

  2. #2

    Default

    307 is probably right, we have a 1970 C-10. It had a 307 originally, sometime in the 80's it spun a bearing and a 327 short block was installed. Should be some "experts" on here that know how long the 307 was used and in what. I'm curious, when I get some time I might do a little searching myself. KEN

  3. #3

    Default

    I fixed the title for you.

    I've never heard of a 307, but that's not to say they didn't exist. I do find it interesting that the sticker calls for 91 octane fuel.
    Christopher

    1991 Chevy Suburban 1/2 ton 2WD w/ chevy SBC 350-3/4 ton drivetrain upgrade w/4.10 gears 200K miles
    2005 Saturn ION-2 Stock 265K miles
    1982 Bronco, 1993 Bronco (sold), 1971 M35A2 Deuce and a Half



    There are 10 kinds of people, those who understand binary, and those who dont...

    Remember kids, the only difference between screwing around and science is writing it down- Adam Savage

  4. #4

    Default

    Gm made two 307 engines. Chev had one in the early '70s and Olds built one in the '80's

    A friend of mine transplanted an Olds 307 into his Chev truck, but usually the trucks had the Chev 307.

    As we all know, the original Chev V8 was 265 cu in, this was bored out to create the 283 cu in engine. The 283 was rebored and stroked to create the 327.

    Then Chev got creative, they used the 327 block and the 283 crank to build the road race 302 cu in for the Camaro. The 283 block and the 327 crank gave them the 307 cu in engine.

    The 302 had lots of horsepower and the 307 had an abundance of torque.

    Both engines, and the 327, were phased out by mid '70s
    Ray

    '09 Avalanche LTZ - Black
    '05 Envoy XL (sold)

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grampy View Post
    307 is probably right, we have a 1970 C-10. It had a 307 originally, sometime in the 80's it spun a bearing and a 327 short block was installed. Should be some "experts" on here that know how long the 307 was used and in what. I'm curious, when I get some time I might do a little searching myself. KEN
    Hi Grampy, Thank's he is looking for general information about the truck and was surprised about the "307". So anything I can find out would be helpful.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Crawdaddy View Post
    I fixed the title for you.

    I've never heard of a 307, but that's not to say they didn't exist. I do find it interesting that the sticker calls for 91 octane fuel.
    Thank you Crawdaddy. I did not notice that, but yes the 91 octane rating for the engine is interesting.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by RayVoy View Post
    Gm made two 307 engines. Chev had one in the early '70s and Olds built one in the '80's

    A friend of mine transplanted an Olds 307 into his Chev truck, but usually the trucks had the Chev 307.

    As we all know, the original Chev V8 was 265 cu in, this was bored out to create the 283 cu in engine. The 283 was rebored and stroked to create the 327.

    Then Chev got creative, they used the 327 block and the 283 crank to build the road race 302 cu in for the Camaro. The 283 block and the 327 crank gave them the 307 cu in engine.

    The 302 had lots of horsepower and the 307 had an abundance of torque.

    Both engines, and the 327, were phased out by mid '70s

    Thank you RayVoy good information.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PantheraUncia View Post
    Thank you Crawdaddy. I did not notice that, but yes the 91 octane rating for the engine is interesting.
    Looking at the label, the spark advance is only 8 deg (not enough to require 91). The longer crank from the 327 must have raised the compression to the point where higher octane was required to prevent spark knock.

  7. #7

    Default

    I dont believe the truck will be a Silverado, that particular model name didnt start until 1973 with the square body generation (1973-1987).
    Gm manufactured the 307 engine from 1968 to 1973, it was mostly found in trucks but did find its way at the factory under the hoods of sedans and stationwagons.
    This particular model engine was also used by Holden (Australia) and GM South Africa.
    Displacement: 307 cu in (5.0 L)
    Power: 115 hp
    Bore and Stroke: 3.875 in 3.25 in (98.4 mm 82.6 mm)
    The crankshaft is sourced from a 327 engine.
    It was originaly intended as a truck engine but use was expanded to the automobile line.
    Its common for trucks with the 307 engine to also have the "Camper Package".
    Its not especially unusual for a truck to have this engine, production numbers for small block V-8 engined trucks were about 35/65% (307/350).
    One thing to also note is most 307 equipped trucks came with manual brakes and steering while their 350 equipped cousins came with power assist brakes and power steering.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tbplus10 View Post
    I dont believe the truck will be a Silverado, that particular model name didnt start until 1973 with the square body generation (1973-1987).
    Gm manufactured the 307 engine from 1968 to 1973, it was mostly found in trucks but did find its way at the factory under the hoods of sedans and stationwagons.
    This particular model engine was also used by Holden (Australia) and GM South Africa.
    Displacement: 307 cu in (5.0 L)
    Power: 115 hp
    Bore and Stroke: 3.875 in 3.25 in (98.4 mm 82.6 mm)
    The crankshaft is sourced from a 327 engine.
    It was originaly intended as a truck engine but use was expanded to the automobile line.
    Its common for trucks with the 307 engine to also have the "Camper Package".
    Its not especially unusual for a truck to have this engine, production numbers for small block V-8 engined trucks were about 35/65% (307/350).
    One thing to also note is most 307 equipped trucks came with manual brakes and steering while their 350 equipped cousins came with power assist brakes and power steering.

    Thank you Tbplus10, all great information. I will let my friend know.

  9. #9
    Sr. Mechanic JTWard's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    I live just south of Philadelphia, small community that sits on the Delaware River.
    Posts
    169

    Default

    I can add an little something here, I have a 305 V8 in my 1990 1500 Silverado. Now a 305 is the original 1955 block with the 265 pistons, and a 350 crank and rods. The added length or stroke gave the 305 very good torque and the small pistons gave it good MPG. Also, I hate to add this, but the old 307 was one of the engines GM fitted with a "Nylon Camshaft gear". When the gear got 70K miles on it, (Or there about, it self destructed) My dad had a 1969 Chevelle hardtop with the famous 307, the engines also had big problems with camshafts. They were face hardened, and not very well done. Once you got a pile of miles on the motor the engine would develop a miss.
    Last edited by JTWard; 07-27-2013 at 06:03 AM.

  10. #10
    Legend

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    River Ridge Louisiana-4 miles W of New Orleans-didn't flood-water stopped 800 yards away.
    Posts
    1,612

    Default

    I wonder if octane ratings have changed-is 91 octane in 1972 same as octane rating now?
    when i was a kid-seems like I remember some very high octane ratings on pumps-high 90's?

    Tetraethyl lead was used then(consideration for those valve seats)-compressions on some motors were high 10.5/1 and 11/1
    for big V-8s before they developed sophisticated combustion chamber designs and controls-10.5/1 was really high

    I wonder if this 91 octane is the same as current 91 octane??
    91 octane would not have been high in 1972 I think?
    1998 suburban-
    1/2 ton

    199500 miles
    River
    Ridge,LA

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •