GM Truck Club
THE PREMIER CHEVY TRUCK & SUV FORUM
Founded in 2004 ~ We're the #1 Chevy Truck & SUV Forum.
Silverado & Sierra | Tahoe & Yukon | Suburban & Yukon XL | SUV & CROSSOVER
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Default Pilot vs Traverse

    My wife and I are in the market for midsize SUV with 3rd row seating. We are still young and styling is a huge factor which helped us narrow it down to the Pilot and Traverse. We considered the CX-9 but it seemed like all of the used ones we found were a few grand more than similar equipped Traverses and Pilots.

    I know this a GMC forum and there will be lots of support for the Traverse but if anyone can provide any input it would be appreciated. Right now we are leaning towards the Pilot. Primarily due to price but also it seems to have a better reliability and service record. The price gap isn't huge but locally, we have found many Pilots with either the EX-L or Touring package for a couple thousand less than LT model Traverses with similar mileage and much cheaper than any LTZ models. We do like the cargo space and middle row seating options in the Traverse better, as well as the ride and overall driving comfort. I think our main concern are the many negative reliability reviews we have read on the Traverse. 2009's seemed pretty bad. I know that was the release year but I would hope for a little better reviews also on the 2010 and 2011 which is probably the newest we could afford if we got a well equipped one.

    I'm open to any and all suggestions, comments, and/or opinions. Thanks.
    WAR EAGLE!!!

  2. #2

    Default

    We went from a trailblazer suv to the Traverse and have not had any issues at all with the vehicle except for owner caused issues like dirt, etc.

    The only thing I would do different is go for a model with rear captains seats instead of a 2nd row bench. Otherwise have not had any issues and we constantly use all of the cargo space.

    Steve
    10 Chevy Traverse LT AWD
    02 Chevy Trailblazer LS (110K+ miles - loaded except for 4WD - WRECKED!)
    99 Chevy Cavalier LS (105K+ miles - commuter car)
    78 Chevy Suburban Silverado (454, 3/4 ton)
    62 GMC 3/4 ton Pickup (350 police interceptor)

    Remember: Search Before Posting | Fill out Your Profile & Signature
    Follow Us Please: facebook.com/gmtruckclub | twitter.com/gmtruckclub
    Support GMTC: Help the site, contribute today

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve View Post
    We went from a trailblazer suv to the Traverse and have not had any issues at all with the vehicle except for owner caused issues like dirt, etc.

    The only thing I would do different is go for a model with rear captains seats instead of a 2nd row bench. Otherwise have not had any issues and we constantly use all of the cargo space.
    Thanks for the reply. The rear captains seats are definitely an advantage for the Traverse as the Pilot doesn't offer those.
    WAR EAGLE!!!

  4. #4

    Default

    Yeah. You do lose one seat ... but we right now have 1 kid in a full time locked in car seat and another in a booster seat. So in the 2nd rear we have to move the booster seat around to lower the 30 (I guess it's a 70/30 split bench ... whatever you call it, the small side) percent side so the kids dont constantly climb over the seats.

    Have you heard of any significant quality and/or longevity issues on any of the Traverse/Acadia/Enclave vehicles?

    Steve
    10 Chevy Traverse LT AWD
    02 Chevy Trailblazer LS (110K+ miles - loaded except for 4WD - WRECKED!)
    99 Chevy Cavalier LS (105K+ miles - commuter car)
    78 Chevy Suburban Silverado (454, 3/4 ton)
    62 GMC 3/4 ton Pickup (350 police interceptor)

    Remember: Search Before Posting | Fill out Your Profile & Signature
    Follow Us Please: facebook.com/gmtruckclub | twitter.com/gmtruckclub
    Support GMTC: Help the site, contribute today

  5. #5

    Default

    I have not seen many major issues like with transmission or the engine itself. Just a ton of minor issues with secondary things that can be fixed easily but still costly if they require a dealer do the work. I should say I've primarily looked at 2009 and 2010 reviews as the newer models with lower miles are mostly out of our price range. Since this vehicle was introduced in 2009 maybe the kinks were worked out by 2011. And maybe a 2011 or newer with higher miles would in fact be more reliable and less hassle than a lower mileage 2009 or 2011. We still have a lot of research to do though but we are in no rush.
    WAR EAGLE!!!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •