Results 1 to 8 of 8
09-23-2009, 11:45 PM #1
Gas mileage difference between 4.3 v6 and 5.7 v8
Hey guys, I'm looking at this 1990 Chevy truck with the 4.3 v6 and a 5-speed. I was just wondering, is the gas mileage difference enough to make up for the less power it has? I want a v8, but if the difference is good enough I might just get the v6.
Your thoughts on this?
Oh, and here's the truck I'm looking at if anyone was wondering:
http://denver.craigslist.org/cto/1380465209.htmlCurrent truck: 1996 Ford 250, 7.3 Powerstroke diesel. Dana 60 SAS, stage 1 160cc injectors, T500 High Pressure Oil Pump, TS 6-position chip, full 4" exhaust, intake, 285 Falken Rocky Mountain AT's, boost/EGT/trans temp pillar gauges, etc...
09-23-2009, 11:58 PM #2
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
I have a '99 old body style 1/2 ton with the 5.7 V8 and I usually get 15 or 16 in town and about 18 on the highway. That is with moderate driving, if i go easy around town I can get 17 or 18, and I get 18 on the highway with going 75, as long as its not uphill in the mountains. The only addition to it I have is a high flow K & N air filter, everything else is stock. I'd go with the V8. There are tons of add ons to improve gas mileage, I plan to buy some of them, but I haven't had the time or money yet to play with it much.
09-24-2009, 07:48 AM #3
First, $2500 for a 20 year old 4x4 is a little high priced, but being a five speed, you should be able to get in the 22 range, my buddy on his 98 4.3, it has also been my experiance that the old TBI motors are easy to extract better mileage then the Vortec motors. Being that its a five speed you can control the engine so much easier by having it in a higher gear, or starting out in 2nd gear from a stop to cut the RPM range, I did this all the time in my old sonoma and got an easy combined MPG of 28 out of the 2.8 V6, I also had dual exhaust with two glasspacks and it sounded awesome.99 K1500 Suburban LT "THE BEAST"
Hypertech III, K&N, true dual
09-24-2009, 08:13 AM #4
Hmmm... well what the difference between the two motors power wise?
09-24-2009, 08:18 AM #5
For that year the motors are non vortec and are TBI so the ratings are not high to begin with, I think the 350 is in the 200hp and the 4.3 is at 150hp, dont quote me but I am sure this is very close, as I believe the last TBI 350 was in 1995 and was around 220hp. It will be noticable, but for me, I would buy for the MPG as like you I already own a suburban
09-24-2009, 11:21 AM #6
09-24-2009, 11:24 AM #7
I don't know about 20 years ago, but I know that my 4.8L gets the same mileage as the 4.3L that a buddy of mine bought. His is an 02 and he has 4x4, mine is an 04 and I don't have 4x4. Don't know if that helps you at all.
09-27-2009, 08:43 AM #8
- Join Date
- Sep 2009
- Mountain Home Id.
I had a 4.3 in a 1986 S-15. Used it on a farm. Wasn't nothing it wouldn't pull. Hopper wagons, water tanks, tractors that got in the mud a little deep. I'm looking for another one. Was in an accident. Absolutely love that motor.
By 07silverado07 in forum Chevy Truck AccessoriesReplies: 4Last: 03-22-2010, 10:24 PM
By silveradfo24's in forum Photo & Video GalleryReplies: 12Last: 03-21-2010, 04:57 PM
By coombia21 in forum Performance & FuelReplies: 2Last: 08-28-2009, 09:47 PM
By Tutut in forum Performance & FuelReplies: 2Last: 11-04-2008, 04:43 PM
By Trailergirl in forum Chevy Trailblazer Forum (GMC Envoy)Replies: 3Last: 10-21-2007, 09:12 AM
Tags for this Thread