Results 1 to 9 of 9
06-27-2011, 06:48 PM #1
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
Why oh why cant the 4.3 be better
Can someone tell me why gm can make the camaro have a v6 that gets 26mpg but the 4.3 only gets 16 to 17mpg.... If the truck was as quick as the camaro then I would complain..
---------- Post added at 06:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:36 PM ----------
Wouldnt... Hate typing on a phone
06-27-2011, 06:53 PM #2
Your economy has something to do with trying to push a 2 1/2 ton box around....When you hear hoofbeats, look for horses not zebras.
06-27-2011, 08:02 PM #3
Welcome to the club. X2 your truck is a box and weighs alot more than your Camero.:cool:
2005 Chevy Silverado Z71 Crew Cab
6" Skyjacker lift w/Edlebrock dual front remote resoviour shocks, single rear remote. Rancho skid-plate.
17" x 9" M/T Classic Lock Wheels, 35" BFG A/T or M/T tires
4.10 PercisionGears w/factory locker, T/A Performance rear-end cover
Banks CAI intake, ported throttlebody, JBA coated headers, over-sized Magnaflow cats, Magnaflow cat back exhaust, Diablo tuned
B&M aluminum deep transmission pan
Warn brush guard w/Warn 9.5 XP winch, PIAA bulbs, Line-X bedliner, AWS Black tool chest, Extang tonneau cover
Weather Tech floor mats
Cover-Craft seat covers
Dash mat cover
Formula One window tint
One black Lab in rear seat.
06-29-2011, 04:47 PM #4
I guess I'd better not complain for the 26.9 mpg I realized on my last tank.
06-29-2011, 05:03 PM #5
06-29-2011, 08:15 PM #6
Well, for starters it's a truck...Don't know why everyone always expects to get as good as mpg as cars. I'm lucky to break into the teen's with mine.
1995 Chevy Tahoe