GM Truck Club
THE PREMIER CHEVY TRUCK & SUV FORUM
Founded in 2004 ~ We're the #1 Chevy Truck & SUV Forum.
Silverado & Sierra | Tahoe & Yukon | Suburban & Yukon XL | SUV & CROSSOVER
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 32 of 32
  1. #31
    Legend

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    River Ridge Louisiana-4 miles W of New Orleans-didn't flood-water stopped 800 yards away.
    Posts
    1,612

    Default

    Keep your current truck-hypermile it-which means pulse and glide in the city.
    It almost NEVER makes sense to dump a paid for-or nearly paid for-reliable vehicle- to buy a new or newer vehicle(usually smaller less versatile) JUST FOR MPG.
    For example-assume you get 13mpg-and the new vehicle gets 17 mpg.
    Student so assume 500 miles per month
    500/13=38.5 gallons/mo= $154 USA
    500/17=29.4 gallons/mo= $118
    You save $36 month or $435 year
    Trading yours for a New Colorado-cost at least $12,000 more- or 25 YEAR PAYBACK.
    Now if you could find a straight even trade-sell yours buy a Colorado
    You would still just save $36 month
    The full sized GMs are usually cheaper and easier to DIY repair-easier to find used parts used low mile engines-get parts anywhere in country
    And they are generally considered to have more reliable drivetrain.

    Smarter play-hypermile your 1/2 ton- get 2 mpg better-so the difference per month is just $20
    Keep the truck you KNOW-and which must be reliable-since you mention no problems with it.

    Yeah-usually a mistake to buy a newer vehicle just for better FE- many folks did just that in 2008-dumped low mile low year Suburbans to get 3 mpg crossovers-and $30,000 notes-since they were usually still upside down on loam
    Keep your truck-unless it is unreliable
    Hypermile it
    Charlie
    PS I'm a mpg nut-will go a long way to get better FE-cars are 2006 Prius 1998 Suburban-
    1/2 tons GMs can get 14-16 mpg in pure city with mild hypermiling-even better depends on actual trip length, temps, redlighs etc-and close to 20 mpg hy at 60-65 mph
    Make sure you run tire pressure at LEAST door decal-and closer to sidewall max is better(if ride doesn't get too rough)
    Pulse and gliding in city has replaced "old style" egg between foot and gas pedal in modern vehicles-worth maybe .5-1 mpg better than "egg under foot"
    1998 suburban-
    1/2 ton

    199500 miles
    River
    Ridge,LA

  2. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pikey View Post
    I have to disagree, I had an 02 silverado 2wd and never got it stuck in the snow. We travel to northern Michigan all the time and never had an issue. I ran the Michelin LTX m\s tires. Yes, 18 inches of fresh snow, I am not doing all that well. 6-12 no problem. When I sold the truck the older guys looking at it had no problem with it being 2wd. It was the younger guys that were horrified that it was not 4x4 and asked if I parked it all winter. I can proudly say that I have not driven a honda civic
    First off, I don't blame you for having proudly said that. Alas, though, it was my wife's first car, and we've had it 17 years now, and it still runs strong (and gets 38-43MPG). LONG time been paid off. Now it works for us.

    As for never getting stuck, I didn't mean to infer that driving a 2wd truck wasn't possible in snow and ice. I did it for years with a Ford Ranger, and then with a 2wd F150. Never got stuck either. But what I did find is that unless I really really weighed down that back end with sand and bricks, it'd slip like crazy on ice. Snow, not so much. Ice... horrible.

    Front Wheel Drive vehicles are inherently more stable on very slick surfaces where the only traction is the two (or one) wheel(s) with power. Pulling a vehicle in the right direction is a whole lot easier than pushing from the back end. The car's butt simply just follows the front. The truck, more than once I'd slide the front end toward something that was unintended.

    I've never done a 180 or a 360 on ice in a car... a 2wd truck on black ice? twice each. Both times, going less than 20 MPH around curves. Scares the crap out of you. 360's are fun though, because you're like "BOOYAH!" and just keep driving.

    Goosing a FWD vehicle typically pulls the car back in. Goosing a RWD vehicle pretty much guarantees a donut. LOL


    All that being said, I still prefer my 4wd truck over either of them!
    -Skippy.
    2006 Vortec Max 1500
    Performance:
    -Custom Tune (389HP 440 Ft/lbs Trq - Dyno'd) | Volant CAI | Magnaflow Dual-in/out Exhaust w/3" stainless pipe tips | Fully Built Transmission w/ Red Eagle Clutches & Kolene Steels w/ Corvette Servos and Stage2 Shift Kit | 35K Tranny Cooler | Mobil 1 | Royal Purple Rear Diff
    Other:
    -Spray-in Bed Liner
    -Premium Sound w/lifetime Satellite Radio | Leather | Sunroof | Heated Seats
    -Limbstriping from USING the truck (those are badges of honor)

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. New regulations for medium and full size truck fuel efficiency
    By Steve in forum Medium-duty Truck Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-04-2012, 08:57 PM
  2. Dems reach deal on fuel efficiency
    By Steve in forum The Coffee Shop ~ Chit Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-22-2007, 08:28 PM
  3. Chevrolet Fuel Solutions: Fuel-Efficiency
    By Steve in forum The Coffee Shop ~ Chit Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-14-2007, 01:10 PM
  4. Luxury cars for fun and fuel efficiency
    By Steve in forum The Coffee Shop ~ Chit Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-01-2007, 11:12 AM
  5. Chrysler to boost fuel efficiency
    By Steve in forum The Coffee Shop ~ Chit Chat
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-21-2007, 03:32 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •