Joined
·
1,665 Posts
Anyone have any idea why the 2001 Suburban 2wd 1500 5.3 has EPA numbers of 13/16, but the 2004 has 14/18 mpg.
I'm thinking about selling my 1998 Suburban,and buying a 2001.The prices on the 2001,2002 etc have been dropping lately,and it looks like I could get an under 100,000 miles LT Suburban for ~$8500.
Obviously,I would love to get the 2004 mpg with a 2002.
What magic did GM do to get the better mpg?Maybe just something with the electronic control? I expect the motor is unchanged, but who knows?
Thanks,
Charlie
I'm thinking about selling my 1998 Suburban,and buying a 2001.The prices on the 2001,2002 etc have been dropping lately,and it looks like I could get an under 100,000 miles LT Suburban for ~$8500.
Obviously,I would love to get the 2004 mpg with a 2002.
What magic did GM do to get the better mpg?Maybe just something with the electronic control? I expect the motor is unchanged, but who knows?
Thanks,
Charlie